Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Fomoiri- Satire of Second Life BDSM RP


Make no mistake.

This is a satire entry towards Second Life which cannot seem to grasp the concept of First amendment. And the contents are NOT about gays in general real life.

Here is the thing about SL. You have a tool to disassociate yourself from the contents. In LL term, it is called *Self Governance tool*. It is basically, to stay away from what you don't like. The tools such as *mute* button, are there to help you utilize that functions.

But the least of them all, if you don't like me, DO NOT OPEN AND PERVE MY PROFILE.
Isn't that simple enough for you?

"I hate fred so let's read his profile! there, he is talking about me! Let's file AR ... "

It is called frivolous AR. And I will AR back at you.

Since there was no entry to point the reader to any particular person nor group, I'm surprised LL even sent me a Warning, but then again, there was a term like *gays* in it, and they can be coddling sensitive about such terms without really comprehending the contents as a whole.
(That is not new.)

So I asked for clarification about what or which or who I am supposed to be intolerant towards to, and who I am supposed to be defaming that inhibits their activity in SL. LMAO

Since I have not engaged directly towards anyone, nor any group in world, there should be no record of anything. LL should come to the conclusion that it was indeed a frivolous complaints.

Meanwhile, I was going to clean my profile and archive my profile picks anyways, so here it is.
All out. And my blog links are posted all over the place, so general public will know what the Fomoiri is about, from my editorial and my humorous satire.

Oh One More Thing.
LL has no jurisdiction over my personal blog. I can post SL conversation, I can name names, I can point the SL groups.

Anyone who has been familiar with my blog should known that there are few SL stupidity made an entry in my blog, and this group/sim will not be the first nor the last.
Many *anonymously * tried to threaten me with the case of libel and defamation, but in the court of law, you will have no chance against my blog contents. It only works inside Second Life, as such, becoming the butt of the joke themselves for their lack of grasp towards the definition of *Community*. lol

So here it is, my satire group picks for Fomoiri.
I rp'd there for about four hours once. They have no clue what the RP is about, so I left. Jager joined there, and harassing the whole sim ever since. He gives me a lot of reports and the list of blunders within the group.
They have trigger happy officers who can only seem to solve the drama by throwing the member that doesn't agree with him, and ban from the sim. If you are eliminating the good RPer who are willing to play an ass, you will end up with no one. And that is what is exactly happening with this sim.

They just bounced two tier contributing members not too long ago.
They can't seem to get rid of Jager, just because no one else is capable of doing the same job. On the other hand, they are also afraid of Jager because of their baseless fear that Jager is some sort of *hacker*... lol

I will publish the chronicle of Fomoiri shortly.

Anyway, enjoy the archive of my profile pick.
You will probably notice that glossary is generally satirical of SL BDSM, RP sim. Not just this particular sim.
I should add that Jemma Magic and Jager, both the member of Fomoiri, thought that these profile entry was funny as hell.

*****************


We are Fomoiri, fierce band of closet gays who cannot afford to out ourselves in our real life. We only comes here with our alts, and pretend to have RP, whilist we have no clue what the RP stands for.
*Disclaimer* The spokes person pictured above is not an attorney. He has better looking av than most of us, so we just stole his picture. Be warned, the reality of our avatars may vary. Some depiction of our avatars might offend some visitors. Visitor Discretion is Strongly Advised.

*Obligatory* :)

Glossary
Definition of Dominant ~Person who lacks self esteem getting off of giving himself some make believe title of a Master.

Submissive~ Person who lacks personality. depending on their group dominant to help them jerk off. In fact,can't even attract their own sexual partner in RL/SL.

BDSM- Tie up others and engage in deviant sexual activity with pixel av. However Political correctness to save our sensibility is compulsory.
Gender blind- We put that there to fool ourselves. Females cause 100% of our drama.

RP- OOC avs pretend to be fake family. Therefore in any role play, we emotionally respond. It is not acceptable to offend our RL sensibility because every ugly pixels there is a emotional bitchy gays behind. We only ban- female- drama whores.
Medieval~We don't know what that means.

King and Queen- Characters who are desperate for other pathetic pixels to save their lack of self esteem. The titles are self proclaimed, as honorable and valuable as any other SL group title, such as *SLut of SL* or *VIP*.
We strive to keep political correctness so that we can alleviate the pain of severely lacking ideals. We do not use the term slaves, so we don't look like the simple brutes of Goreans. We are much more sophisticated. So just you know, we call them Jewels.

Fiana (Knights)---Another title to manipulate pixels with low self esteem, so they feel more important than they could be in RL. In truth, they are pixels working for this honorable title, (for free) and contributes to our abysmal traffic in exchange of place to hang out. This goes for all other lesser titles. Just don't tell them.

Title of Honor--- "We didn't sign up SL to be called MR, thank you. It is *Your Highness* to you, Thou tottering tardy-gaited ratsbane!"

Monday, February 15, 2010

Applause for Starz Channel

So I have been watching new TV series, "Spartacus: Blood and Sand" on Starz channel. I have not made any opinion over this series till the episode "The thing in The Pit" (Episode 104) for few reasons.

Of course, I was impressed with the amount of violence and blatant sexual content as any other audience which is a easy guess. The creators Sam Raimi and Robert Tapert has been one of the most radical creators on both silver screens and TV. It was just a matter of time that these two come up with something that push the limit of *norm of the time*. For that, they are the true artists.

So with all the bells and whistles, why I have not had any opinion about the series?
Because of the lacking portrayal of bisexuality up until the episode 103.
Well, there was a slight suggestion, such as kiss between two female characters however, it could have been perceived as the simple custom of the time, or simply, it could perceived as European influenced custom.

With all the sex scenes, including the suggestion of orgy, plenty of male full frontal nude scene(yay!-Any one can appreciate the fine specimens of human males. It is no brainer. ), the stable full of naked gladiators, I was wondering why there was not a scene/plot of homosexuality/pederasty. I was wondering why the creators stopped at the mere sex scenes or frontal nude, if it was their intention to push the envelope.

Well, wonder no more.
In the episode 104-The Thing in The Pit, achieved all of the above and then some. There was an unmistakable(not an suggestion) sex between two male characters. Of which, also could perceived as pederasty, since the younger character seems to be in early 20s or even in late teens .
There was a very graphic and violent depiction of underground fight scenes which included some gruesome ritual by the victor who skinned the face of the defeated.

And, frontal nude of amputee shemale. (!!!)
I mean...
I thought it was a female till I watched the same episode *on Demand* seeing the extra package she carried, and totally applauded the casting, producers and at the end, Starz channel for approving that sort of edgy depiction of the underground Roman culture ever in the history of TV. (Especially in US.)
They could have get away with a scene with just a two female slaves hang nude in the chains, but no.

Seriously, I could not recall anything like this.
Sex scenes cannot be any more graphic without becoming pornography. Violence is unapologetic.

I thought there must be a lot of criticism by whiny American audiences who cannot seem to know how to turn the TV off and let TV station babysit them, by censoring the contents. But Starz shut them all up by putting disclaimer before the episode starts.

In short, if you can't take the heat, get out the kitchen.

Hats off to Starz channel, and I expect bisexual orgies!

Monday, February 8, 2010

Here is my Profile by Jemma Magic

This is how others write my profile.

I'm a condescending jackass that should go back to sitting in my selfmade tower of lonliness on my throne because no one in the world is good enough, smart enough or beautiful enough to be my equal.
I have no respect for people that try to befriend me, they are a waste of my time. Anything I disagree with is stupid. Of course, I'd use bigger words, but no one would understand this if I did.
----------------------------------------------
Picks:

Pictures of myself
------------------------------------------------
First life tab:

I fool myself and say RL and SL never meet




Jemma Magic used to be the guest of my sim and friend of Lord Diglett who is lurking around here time to time.

She claims to know me from very small time we spent at my sim. In fact, I really don't know the reason she so hate me, since we never really engaged in an activity together to cause passionate discussion or debate. We have nothing in common for the most part, other than we have mutual friend. That is about it.

Since she was a guest of my guest, I welcomed her as such. I allowed her to stop by or invite her friends whenever she liked.

I have been cordial and polite to her all the time I was speaking to her. Therefore, it somewhat mind boggled me when I was told that she claimed I was condescending towards her when no one is around.
The fact is that, I was rarely alone with her for any reason.


"I have no respect for people that try to befriend me, they are a waste of my time."

This quote according to her entry is the prime example of how much she doesn't know me.
Anyone who is trying to befriend another, usually have mutual *respect* and *common courtesy* between us when both party is trying to develop a friendship/relationship.
None of my friends ever skipped this process. Some are put on probation (meaning that I decide to observe the person without cutting them off) and some made an effort to better themselves when it come to SL relationship. My requirements are very simple to understand, and none should have any difficulty with it. If it was not what they were looking for, they have all the control not to engage with Frederic's character. I never stalk nor track anyone who doesn't like me.
Jemma Maigic, however, she assumed to claim my friendship without build that trust and friendship and assumed that she will be my friend on default because she is a friend of my friend.

That was a serious mistake on her part.

She pretended to be my friend, at the same time she spoke badly about me when she was with our mutual friend. I really could careless what she thinks of me, since she never confronted me about my own shortcomings or my faults.

There are lot of accusation of my faults from her. The bottom line? Was she ever trying to clarify what I meant? No. Never.
Was it really the fault of my character? I am not sure.

The last real conversation I had with her, was the time *I* confronted her and asked clarification of why she bitched about my character faults to our mutual friend, and not to me.

She basically blamed that she wasn't the one who said it. She blamed what was said was in fact, from Jager.
My answer to that? Jager can tell that to me, and if I am a boring person, Jager can leave my sim anytime he wanted. (Yes, one of my character faults according to her, was *boring person* LOL)

There was not even a single line she can quote me the actual *abusive conversation when Jager was not around* . Nor a single incident that I was impolite to her. On the other hand, person claiming to be my friend will never spoke bad about me in my absence.

Is she expecting me to allow her all the impoliteness, double talking behind my back before we establish our trust of our friendship, and accept her as my friend?
She needs to think about that first.

After that last confrontation, I have not spoken to her. She has no basis for developing further understandings of my character ever since. Yet, she titled her notecard as "Person who used to knew him (Frederic)". Hilarious.

My rebuttal.

Jemma Magic never made it to the status of my friend. She forfeited that chance all on her own.
Do not ever accuse me of being condescending towards people who try to befriend me. I am only condescending towards people who is unable to grasp the basic logic of *building trust and friendship/relationship* and trying to claim my trust without showing basic courtesy and honesty.